In recent weeks, I’ve been caught in the upswing of operations and business development that I’ve grossly neglected everything else – e.g., producing content for this blog. Now that we have completed our main order for Jindal Southwest and await the beginning of that trial, production has slowed and I’ve had a chance stepped back to pause and recollect my scattered responsibilities.

When we started production in May, the new stream of operations workflow brought with it a whole host of challenges, which I won’t revisit. Amongst other challenges, setting up and running productions was like a black hole that consumed all my extra time and energy that sometimes could’ve been better spent elsewhere. For the first 2.5 weeks, I sat for whole days working with the women in the workshop, at the end of which was left little time for all the business development work. Even as the workshop became independent enough to run itself, there still remained the daily check-ins on progress, productivity, quality, etc. Between these daily interruptions and the frequent fire drills of supply shortages or unexpected employee absences, the long-term workplans simmered away on the back burner, overlooked.

I realized that the myopia that occurred during our heavy production phase was just one incidence of shortsightedness amongst many. Perhaps, one of the most difficult and unexpected challenges that I’ve faced in working with a start-up has been to remain focused on the bigger picture. I expected that business school and management consulting had trained me well enough to focus on the 10,000 ft. view, and yet it was so easy to get caught by the immediate concerns – daily production reports, last minute sales meetings, networking opportunities, etc. – that I never realized that my 10,000 ft. view was really a 10 ft. view. I realize in hindsight that the trap is easy to fall into because addressing immediate concerns gives a more tangible sense of productivity than working on something with a longer timeline. Everything that we did was in line with our general objectives of getting the business going, but I doubt that we structured and used our time wisely.

In the past few weeks, my partner and I finally had time sat down to talk about the company. There are things that we should’ve done at the very beginning – broad framework exercises – which could’ve better informed some of the decisions that we made. With more time on our hands, we’ve sat down to do a detailed stakeholders’ analysis. As we talked through the various customer segments and the purchase motivations, I realized how differently he and I perceived the buyers’ motivations, which explained a few of our major disagreements. In discussing our raw materials’ suppliers, I again discovered just how differently we could’ve managed our supply chain and avoided a number of our daily stress instigators. So many of the decisions that we disagreed upon simply stemmed from the different perspectives and understanding we had of the business.

The entire time that we were working on generating more sales and manufacturing for orders, we both thought that we had fixed upon the larger vision and were aligned in our understanding of the business. The first week that we started working together, we created a workplan with short and long term goals and sales targets – this was what we thought the big picture meant. But now I realize how myopic that was. The bigger picture discussion should’ve meant objectives and targets even broader than simply sales targets that would inform a framework for how we would make business decisions. For example, should we take on an order if we don’t have the production capacity for it or if in order to produce it we would have to hire men workers? The sales targets and goals we established for ourselves were tactical and are useless in the evaluation of the option. Especially since it turns out my partner and I had different understandings of the business, we should’ve established broader values for our business so that we knew what to prioritize when a decision presented us with a conflict of objectives.

Seeing the bigger picture is hard. Certainly harder in a dynamic, changing business scenario. It’s easier when you’re looking at it as a static business case in a classroom or consulting conference room. Constant reevaluation of your understanding of the business is a must. In a start-up, you can’t stop stepping back and making sure that you’re making decisions with a 10,000 ft. perspective, because it’s so easy to think that when you’re actually about 10 ft. from the ground. I’m sure that a month from now, I’ll be feeling myopic all over again.

One of the more practical sessions at the Sankalp Forum last week was on developing the brand of an enterprise, sponsored by the brand consulting firm Center of Gravity. Unlike many of the theoretical, overarching discussion panels of the state of the social entrepreneurship sector, this session provided concrete advice for start-ups on how to begin thinking about their branding strategy. Appropriate brand management is often undervalued by start-ups who have enough capital expenditures to worry about without also needing to hire a brand consultancy firm. Yet, it is an important consideration that can aid in gaining traction. The session provided a few simple guidelines for start-ups, which albeit obvious can still be useful points to begin with:

1. Understand the profile of your customers

Center of Gravity begins the branding process with a market segmentation analysis to understand the demographics and motivations of the customers. Enterprises often approach the market potential as one homogenous mass of consumers, whereas the customers are a diverse group with different motivations for making the purchase. For example, organic food consumers are not all driven to purchase for health reasons – some people go organic because it’s a perceived indicator of social status , and others buy organic because it’s more sustainable and eco-friendly.

2. Make your cause and message relevant

After understanding the consumption drivers of the primary customer segments, it’s important to create targeted brand messages relevant to each segment. People respond to messages with which they identify. The healthy eater would not respond in the same way to Whole Food’s upscale organic brand, whereas the status seeker would. It’s important to make sure that your brand message is aligned with your growth strategy if you need to target certain customer segments.

3. Provide a “So-What?” statement that connects your social impact to the customer’s choice

Consumers are lazy, so don’t leave it for them to make the connection between the product and the social impact. Demonstrate a clear link between the purchase decision and the environmental / social impact. For example, if your organic produce company directly helps small local farmers, have a story of that farmer on your package.

4. Do more with less by leveraging high profile endorsers

This piece of advice is a no-brainer. Every start-up would love to do more with less, and if there happens to be an influential person who is sympathetic to your cause, all the better. Center of Gravity gave an example of how they engaged famous Indian stars for a democratic campaign in Bangalore, but hardly every start-up has the good fortune of such endorsers. A better corollary to this particular advice would be to engage everyone and anyone who is willing to speak for your company. A particular CSR person may not have the power to make the purchasing decision, but they can influence and convince others in that position of power to make that decision.

5. Simplify the complexities of your enterprise

Every entrepreneur is very excited about their start-up and can talk about their company until the room runs out of oxygen. This isn’t an intelligent way to sell your company. It may seem that every detail is important, but the more you complicate the story, the less the audience and potential customer will retain. Condense those complications into a simple, memorable story that will stay with them after your conversation. Remember that the average attention span is <1 minute, which is why the pithier, the better.

For the most part, the advice given above is more easily applied to consumer facing products and services, whereas niche market companies have a harder time developing a strong brand equity that contributes significant value. I continue to struggle with creating a brand identity for my company, Coir Atlas, which operates in a niche market within the greater steel industry, but I think the lessons learned from this session are general enough to be applied. The key as with all marketing advice is in understanding how to adapt it to fit to your enterprise’s needs. Don’t just blindly apply all branding strategies and go chasing Bollywood stars to be the face of your product. Adapt these strategies and then apply them.